Yesterday I was substituting for the librarian in a K-2 school. In three of the classes I read a book, then allowed the younguns to browse through the shelves to look at books. About four boys in each class refused to have anything to do with the books, and sat at the table instead of even looking at pictures.

I will say that one boy finally did give up and start looking at books, if only from boredom. But what’s with that, anyway? Boys no longer want anything to do with books?

_____________________________________

A caller I’ve spoken with several times was telling me a while back about some female superiority writing he had been looking at. It described the female as more evolved than the male of the human species, saying that females have continued to adapt, while males are still essentially cavemen, unready for civilization.

That sounds all well and good, but not having seen the article myself, I was unable to imagine a mechanism that would allow females to continue to evolve while males stopped doing so.

Having considered this for a while, I now am convinced that males have indeed continued to evolve, but in the wrong direction.

Enter male agressive risk-taking behavior. As I often tell my callers, the male mountain goats are seen in those nature documentaries butting their heads against each other, either falling off the mountainside or causing themselves brain damage. While the (invariably male) narrator drones on about the males competing to gain the favor of females, you might not notice that there are never any females in sight. They are off raising the next generation, pretty much ignoring the battles on the mountainside.

Now in the case of human females and males, the males are pulling foolish stunts like street racing and bungee-jumping. When asked, they will say they are doing these activities to impress women. Of course, the women are not impressed in the slightest by what they consider to be immature behavior by the men.

A slightly larger number of babies born each year are males than females, yet adult females generally outnumber males overall. It was theorized in the past that this could be attributed to young male babies being more succeptible to congenital and/or infectious diseases, or men dying in war more often then women. A study finally analyzed these statistics and found that the difference in adult numbers could be attributed entirely to male risk-taking behaviors. In other words, these males are voluntarily thinning the herd, but the individuals being selected are braver and bolder, but more foolhardy and less intellectual. In other words, they have weaker self- and group- (family) preservation instincts, and are slower on the uptake. Hmm, sounds like modern males, especially the younguns.

I found a cool newspaper article, but after all this writing, I don’t have time to work on it. I’ll try to summarize and analyze it tomorrow, and if not, then the weekend.

Ta-ta, guys.

I was in a 6th grade class where the students were doing some writing. A boy turned to the girl next to him and asked her how to spell “attacked”. She rolled her eyes and spelled it for him. Of course, since she was an ESL student, it’s hard to figure out why she would be more likely to know how to spell a common English word than a native speaker. He was entirely oblivious of this. Well, either that, or he is just aware of his natural inferiority…

Another day this week I spent in a grade 3-5 behavior classroom. There were 4 adults and five students in the room, but more specifically, there were 5 boys in the room.

Why no girls? Why are behavior classes full of boys, and why do special ed classes seem to have more boys than girls?

On the one hand, it has been shown that boys are more likely to misbehave, and thus get the attention that would get them evaluated and placed. But why is it the case that boys with educational issues act out, while girls do not?

As I see it, the boys have fewer resources all told - emotional, mental, and social. Therefore, when they have academic issues, they have less to fall back on. They are already maxed out. Thus, they frustrate earlier and act out in response, rather than attempting other actions.

Another class I was in this week was a high school French class. I had a section of level 2 and level 5. Level 5 was 10 girls and 2 boys, typical ratio for an advanced-level class nowadays.

A lot of things have happened since the last time I updated. For one thing, I’ve started doing a little femdom counseling for people (read: guys) in need of advice about submission and their life situations. I’ve gotten some interesting calls, and I think I’ve been helpful to those males who are coming to grips with their submissive natures and their life circumstances.

For a little or a lot of personal femdom counseling, you can call me on this line:

1-800-TO-FLIRT, extension 0604692

An issue that has come up is with submissives assuming what I want, how I want them to serve me. Of course, femdom means that a submissive male serves a dominant female. In other words, he does things for her, and what he does depends on her wishes - or at least it is supposed to. I like to think that I am able to assign to each sub a project that can give him a challenge and an opportunity for personal growth. At the same time, there are things that I need. so, according to this paradigm, subs are able to fill the needs of their Mistress with a variety of services based on their talents and resources.

I picture the ideal relationship with a personal sub as fulfilling each other’s needs. He needs to serve me. Among the things I may need done are housework, yardwork, and home and auto repair, and I can also use money. The reward for doing a good job may be play.

But there seems to be a significant number of malesubs who think that because I’m a “Mistress”, I want them to pimp themselves out, as though this is the only use I could find for them, and my only interest. I’m rather nonplussed by this. Clearly they are projecting their own desires on me by making this assumption without asking me about my wishes.

But is that all it is now? Mistress = forced bi? What happened to the wishes and needs of the Mistress?

What does it mean to me to say that females are superior? At least partly I see this as a biological thing. In other words, we can gain useful insight from making comparisons with other species of animals.

For instance, what is the natural behavior of males and females? In general, the primary function of females is to assure the continuation of the species, and so females spend much of their energy preparing to bear young, bearing young, and raising young to self-sufficiency.

But what about males? The act of fertilization takes very little of their time or energy. So what do they expend their energy on? Mostly they seem to compete agressively with other males, although there may be no females available to be impressed with their risky behaviors. A recent study showed that human males claim to be engaging in high-profile risky behaviors like bungee jumping in order to impress females, while females are uniformly unimpressed. Other typical male behaviors involve playing with other males non-aggressively, and leaving the females to perpetuate the species alone.

So what does this say about males and females in general? Most of male energy is wasted or counterproductive to the survival of the species. That generally works, because nature has supplied a surplus of male fertilization capacity to make up for such counterproductive activities. In fact, if 99% of the human males were to disappear due to some strange set of circumstances, there would still be plenty left to provide all the reproductive services necessary to females.

But I think I hear you saying that human males partake in all sorts of productive activities. It is true that we are not mountain goats, which regularly butt each other off mountains. But it is also true that males no longer seem to be competing academically, now that females have chosen to compete in the academic arena. 60% of bachelor’s degrees are now awarded to females, and each year a higher percentage of the college student population is female.

Beginning with middle school, students are more and more being given an opportunity to participate in their education, to ‘choose’ to succeed. And more males each year choose to spend those academic years screwing off. By the time they have gotten to high school, they are unready for college track work and give up, spending their time in gut level courses. They have decided that academics is a female arena and males do not compete against females.

So we have males unprepared for college or even the workforce. Where generations previous expected men to support families, and thus they had to prepare to lead productive lives, now young males expect females to support themselves, and possible their boyfriends, too.

These same males are failing to make the commitments necessary to form nuclear families. They are slackers, and intend to stay that way, playing with their buddies and working dead-end jobs, while their girlfriends drive them around and buy them things.

It is the freedom to choose to slack off that is new to males, and they are choosing it in droves. Women are increasingly occupying positions of authority as they become the majority of qualified candidates for better jobs.

What’s to be done? On the one hand, it’s time to stop giving unmotivated middle and high school students the opportunity to choose not to participate in their education. But on the other hand, we need to examine the idea that it is universally true that people will choose to work in order to excel when given the opportunity to choose to do so. Males do better in the matriarchally-centered elementary schools. If you want to watch dominant women in action, go to any elementary school. Students who are willing to take charge of their learning should be allowed the freedom to do so, but students who have not shown this motivation, mostly boys, will need to be firmly guided throughout their education unless they acquire that motivation, and possibly throughout their lives. They need to be controlled and directed by a strong woman to lead happy and productive lives. They need femdom.

I had always been an egalitarian type person. But since I discovered the concept of female superiority, I have come to realize that the egalitarian model fails to explain many observations I have been making.

I now realize that women are superior to men. Individual differences aside, when women have freedom, they tend to work harder to succeed, while when men have freedom, they tend to waste all their time and money playing.

Think about wild mountain goats. The males are butting each other off the mountainside, ostensibly for the favor of the females. But where are the females? They are raising the next generation, oblivious to the aggressively competitive games that the bucks are playing.

Men have traditionally had laws to prevent women from participating in education and work. Learning was considered an arena for male competition. But now that females are excelling in schools, males no longer are competing aggressively. Females now receive 60% of degrees granted in colleges, while males are slacking off more and more in their early years, beginning with middle school.

More later guys.